" You should lead everyone , you should not follow anybody "
Thank you :)
" You should lead everyone , you should not follow anybody "
Thank you :)
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Verified answer
I have seen many leaders but i am waiting for that leader who is un-biased by any follower and by any worldly thing. You first learn from the outside, then you bring changes in the inside. And most of the time in doing so you forget yourself and lost in the pain and pleasure of the worldly stuff. You can become a great leader but what's the purpose of becoming a leader which can't show us our real purpose of life and our true identity.
Take an example of Gautama Buddha, he learned many things during his journey in forest but nothing helped him to attain nirvana . ultimately he had to lose every thought of what he has learned and went to the meditation. he followed nobody and only then he attained what he wanted to. Now he leads millions of people. But you can also see, that you have never heard about the second Buddha born out from those millions of followers.
i think it is a non egoistic sentence.
Namaste :)
No, it is egoTistic. The egoist would not try to lead anyone with a 'should' attached to it. However, an egoist would feel bad if s/he was the best to lead his people out of Egypt (for example) and did not do so; or if he was the best to lead his squadron, and did not do so.
But an egoist says: "“I will not run anyone’s life—nor let anyone run mine. I will not rule nor be ruled. I will not be a master nor a slave. I will not sacrifice myself to anyone—nor sacrifice anyone to myself.” Ayn Rand
An egotist who thinks he 'should' lead, is sacrificing the lives of others who don't want him as the leader. Who is he, to say he 'should' lead?
Sentences are neither egoistic or any thing else; THEY ARE KALA AKSHAR BHAINS BRABER; they are merely the expressions of the type and kind of consciousness and knowledge; with which they have either been spoken, said, or written.
One needs to know about the realities of such knowledge for helping him to realize the true worth of the words in a sentence; which he can know only and only; by learning and knowing about; and by reading and understanding the contents and constituents of the type and kind of sound from which they; i.e the alphabets of the words; originated in the first place
SHREE MAT BHAGWAT GITA Chapter 10, Verse 33.
A. Of letters I am the letter A,
B. of different kinds of compounds that go into the making of the alphabet; i am the copulative compound;in grammer; i.e that which serves to join or unite words and create grammer; and
C. among compounds I am the dual word. I am also inexhaustible time, and of creators I am Brahma, whose manifold faces turn everywhere.
no its not egoistic it's true for a passionate person but the fact is to lead always we have to follow sometimes,
its someone with an inferiority complex which derives from the ego. but listen to what he is saying. better to be a leader than a follower. but there is also nothing wrong in following either. one day you'll realize your time has come to lead.
Of course it is egoistic. It places undue worth in the ego.
Nope not egoistic but courageous..
The sentence is in a commanding manner and the sense is impractical and unaffordable.
Is that from the Indian Road Rules booklet ?
Language of the sentence is egoistic but spirit of the sentence is encouraging. Thanks