what time does the first bus leave - whats the frequency of buses between Port and DC
Home
/
Washington, D.C.
/
what gate number does greyhound leave from port authority to dc?
what time does the first bus leave - whats the frequency of buses between Port and DC
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Verified answer
You can check Greyhound schedules on the Greyhound site:
http://www.greyhound.com/home/
You can get station information here:
http://www.greyhound.com/home/en/Location/States.a...
Greyhound Port Authority Gate
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
what gate number does greyhound leave from port authority to dc?
what time does the first bus leave - whats the frequency of buses between Port and DC
Greyhound Nyc To Dc
You can check the Greyhound website. But I gotta tell you, the Greyhound bus station in DC is even nastier than Port Authority and in a rather sketchy neighborhood. If you're traveling between NYC and DC, you should try Bolt Bus or Megabus, which are much nicer, and they drop you off in a large parking lot near Metro Center. They're also cheaper.
It is of no avail trying to get any compelling insight on this froum, Obama could convince these drones that Elvis had a voice that sounded like nails on a chalkboard. While on the other hand the Conservative has a massive prenotion of Obama guilt, they'd want impeachment hearings if Obama ordered a hamburger without ketchup. A lot of things our President does, such as lying and perpetuating falsehood are immoral but not cynically illegal. Everyone who works closely with the President is a lawyer including himself and his wife, in this sense he is very well protected, and yet to be found of violating any law or committing an impeachable offense.
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/bV6Jl
The "Bachmann-Palin" reference for your avatar explains a lot when considering the inane and ill-informed query. None of the above-cited incidents are as negative for President Obama as the "Republican Noise Machine" (Brock, 2004) would have us all believe. There is no scandal for any of the three you've cited. The Cincinnati, Ohio office of the IRS took a short-cut for handling the mountain of requests for tax exempt status that poured in after the idiotic 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United that made corporations "people"...and the teabagging evangelical group that swiped Ron Paul's already-in-use internet name, Tea Party, was given more scrutiny (rightly so, in my opinion, given their lobbyist funding and their nefarious origins). The IRS allows tax exemption for 501(c)(3), (4), (5), and (6), but only if there is no violation by the group claiming this exemption---a violation being directly engaging in political campaigns. The so-called Tea Party did involve itself directly in political campaigns, starting in summer 2009 when the ragtag whackjob Glenn Beck's staffers were recruited as a "group" by FreedomWorks and the Koch brothers' Americans for Prosperity to deliberately OBSTRUCT Democrats-only town hall meetings in order to block insurance reforms (funded of course by the INSURANCE industry). As the Koch brothers (oil barons) funneled more and more money into their anti-Obama viciousness, the Tea Party grew---and because they were funded by far-rightwing Republican extremists to be involved directly in political campaigns, they were NOT qualified to receive tax exempt status. The IRS was doing its job (see "The Last Word" broadcast from May 15, 2013, with Lawrence O'Donnell). No "there" there on Benghazi either, and the Congressional Republicans know it. Associated Press is not a scandal either, even though the GOP keeps grasping at straws and the spoiled-brat media doesn't like to be told they have to give precendence to national security over ad buys and ratings. Check out the details (put your brain "in gear") before you run off at the mouth. Why are you siding with would-be terrorists over the interests of the nation? There was a very select circle of people, each of them with TOP-SECRET clearance, who knew that the U.S. had possession of the new-fangled "Fruit of the Boom" type of bomb when another Yemen-originating attack was prevented (way to go, Obama team!). The triggering mechanism for this new type of bomb was different than the original version, and the entire attempt was still being investigated thoroughly, going all the way back to the Yemen faction. By having this information revealed during a time when this nation is at war, whoever leaked to the AP has committed an ACT OF TREASON against the U.S. and has impeded the investigation that could have prevented more such attempted attacks. So again I ask, why are you siding with the would-be bombers? Shame on you.